Skip to content
Assembly and Fortran

Works cited

Metadata
Field Value
source ../Video_Breakdown_and_Concepts.md
document Technical Architecture and Systems Deconstruction of Inkbox’s “It Took Every SNES Hardware Trick To Make My Game”
kind references
parent
lines 205-234
video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_2bo7ng65E
findings D14-m9

Source video: It Took Every SNES Hardware Trick To Make My Game (Inkbox, 51:14). The video does not cover this idea. The citations point to a news article, not to the video.

  1. Zero Star Climbs Out of Two Years of Pure SNES Assembly, https://www.techeblog.com/zero-star-homebrew-snes-game-assembly-language/
  2. https://hackaday.com/2026/09/11/hand-coded-asm-powers-homebrew-snes-game/
  3. It Took Every SNES Hardware Trick To Make My Game - YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_2bo7ng65E
  4. Snes | Hackaday, https://hackaday.com/tag/snes/
  5. Reverse Engineering Game Code from the Neutral Zone - YouTube, https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5HSjJU562e8&lc=Ugy4qjY-Y5rwAX55K_N4AaABAg
  6. YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/live/kYLJLJkVfLk?pp=0gcJCbIJAYcqIYzv
  7. Post by SNES-Testberichte in 〇 Star comments - itch.io, https://itch.io/post/17378575
  8. https://inkbox-software.itch.io/zerostar
  9. Super Nintendo Entertainment System | Hackaday, https://hackaday.com/tag/super-nintendo-entertainment-system/
  10. The Real Reason Unity Is Finally Dropping Mono - YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ojM9tgbcbwU

Inline numbers in other segments (e.g. ...conventions2.) refer to this list.

Review findings for this part

Section titled “Review findings for this part”

The findings come from ../../findings/ (pass 1). The script matches them to this part by source line.

ID Severity Evidence Status Location Problem
D14-m9 minor DOC VERIFY verify L205-216 Claim: Ten works cited. Problem: Sources 5, 6 and 10 are a video about a different topic, a live stream and a video about Unity. They have no link to this video. Source 2 (Hackaday) has one sentence about the game (checked by WebFetch), but the text cites it for the structure and the lessons of the video.

Review worksheet

Section titled “Review worksheet”

1. Goal of this part

Section titled “1. Goal of this part”

What does this part try to show, or help the reader decide?

2. Key claims to test

Section titled “2. Key claims to test”
# Claim Evidence given (citation / data) Verifiable?
1

3. Adversarial review

Section titled “3. Adversarial review”
  • Strongest counter-argument:
  • Unsupported, overstated, or outdated claims:
  • Source quality (primary vs. blog/forum/marketing):
  • Omissions / what a skeptic would ask:
  • Internal consistency with other segments:

4. Evaluation

Section titled “4. Evaluation”
  • Does the segment achieve its goal? (Yes / Partly / No)
  • Confidence: (High / Medium / Low)
  • Required fixes: