Works cited
Source video: FORTRAN in 100 Seconds (Fireship, 2:38). The video does not cover this idea. The list of sources never cites the video.
- ||Fortran programming||ch: 6 (Formated input and output) Part 1, https://www.facebook.com/groups/807086490171078/posts/837729330440127/
- John Backus - De Programmatica Ipsum, https://deprogrammaticaipsum.com/john-backus/
- Introduction to the Fortran Programming Language - YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1-dYUN831k
- FORTRAN in 100 Seconds - YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NMWzgy8FsKs
- FORTRAN | Hackaday, https://hackaday.com/tag/fortran/
- Looking At Fortran In 100 Seconds - Hackaday, https://hackaday.com/2022/07/16/looking-at-fortran-in-100-seconds/
- Fortran in 100 Seconds, https://fortran-lang.discourse.group/t/fortran-in-100-seconds/3718
- Is there a “standard” file suffix for modern Fortran code?, https://fortran-lang.discourse.group/t/is-there-a-standard-file-suffix-for-modern-fortran-code/3550
- Print a Statement in Fortran - YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1PnJ0JPbnjg
- Why Fortran is used in scientific community ? : r/Physics - Reddit, https://www.reddit.com/r/Physics/comments/1fc124j/why_fortran_is_used_in_scientific_community/
- 16 | July | 2022 | Hackaday | Page 2, https://hackaday.com/2022/07/16/page/2/
- Introduction to Numerical Methods and Fortran Programming, https://ftp.mat-travel.com/journal/ACyXKlnVklGZ/IntroductionToNumericalMethodsAndFortranProgramming
- Volume 08: 2025-2026 - De Programmatica Ipsum, https://www.deprogrammaticaipsum.com/pdf/volume-08-2025-2026.pdf
- Anecdotal Fortran… :-) - Page 11, https://fortran-lang.discourse.group/t/anecdotal-fortran/704?page=11
- FORTRAN 90 95 FOR SCIENTISTS AND ENGINEERS - live.kibu.ac.ke, https://live.kibu.ac.ke/report/nR29at4FE087/Fortran-90-95-For-Scientists_And-Engineers
Inline numbers in other segments (e.g.
...conventions2.) refer to this list.
Review findings for this part
Section titled “Review findings for this part”The findings come from ../../findings/ (pass 1). The script matches them to this part by source line.
| ID | Severity | Evidence | Status | Location | Problem |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D07-C1 | critical | DOC | open | L5-89, L93, L98 | Claim: The superscript numbers cite sources for each sentence.. Problem: The citations do not support the text. Source [1] is a Facebook group post about formatted input and output. The report cites it about 15 times for history, uppercase letters, character sizes, functions, intent and coarrays. Source [6] is a Hackaday article. The reviewer read it (WebFetch). It does not discuss card columns, keypunch models or errors in the video. But the report cites [6] for these (L11, L15, L20, L53). |
Review worksheet
Section titled “Review worksheet”1. Goal of this part
Section titled “1. Goal of this part”What does this part try to show, or help the reader decide?
2. Key claims to test
Section titled “2. Key claims to test”| # | Claim | Evidence given (citation / data) | Verifiable? |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
3. Adversarial review
Section titled “3. Adversarial review”- Strongest counter-argument:
- Unsupported, overstated, or outdated claims:
- Source quality (primary vs. blog/forum/marketing):
- Omissions / what a skeptic would ask:
- Internal consistency with other segments:
4. Evaluation
Section titled “4. Evaluation”- Does the segment achieve its goal? (Yes / Partly / No)
- Confidence: (High / Medium / Low)
- Required fixes: