Works cited
- How did 80-90s gamedev compile their games? - Reddit, https://www.reddit.com/r/gamedev/comments/18aj95l/how_did_8090s_gamedev_compile_their_games/
- Exploring Retro Game Programming Languages - From Assembly to, https://www.retroreversing.com/programming-languages
- What makes Fortran more straightforward for scientific and … - Quora, https://www.quora.com/What-makes-Fortran-more-straightforward-for-scientific-and-engineering-computations-compared-to-C
- The Evolution of Programming Languages: From Assembly to High, https://medium.com/@kodegasm.id/the-evolution-of-programming-languages-from-assembly-to-high-level-languages-8d1417631203
- Why were old games programmed in assembly when higher level, https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4904707/why-were-old-games-programmed-in-assembly-when-higher-level-languages-existed
- Fortran - Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fortran
- What programming languages were commonly used for games, https://www.reddit.com/r/gamedev/comments/s65pyp/what_programming_languages_were_commonly_used_for/
- Courses Based on CS:APP - CS:APP3e, Bryant and O’Hallaron, https://csapp.cs.cmu.edu/3e/courses.html
- Some people believe that RISC-V is simple and elegant, other, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42960796
- ARM vs x86; What are the key differences? - Stack Overflow, https://stackoverflow.com/questions/44269853/arm-vs-x86-what-are-the-key-differences
- BASIC vs. FORTRAN 77: Comparing programming blasts from the past, https://opensource.com/article/23/4/basic-vs-fortran-77
- rlauzon54/fortran77: Microsoft FORTRAN programs - GitHub, https://github.com/rlauzon54/fortran77
- 12 Best Assembly Language Courses for 2026: ARM to RISC-V, https://www.classcentral.com/report/best-assembly-courses/
- What Is Machine Code? The Complete 2026 Guide - Articsledge, https://www.articsledge.com/post/machine-code
- Fortran-lang.org, https://fortran-lang.org/
- Ghidra vs IDA Pro: Key Features Explained | PDF - Scribd, https://www.scribd.com/document/882778522/session-3
- Find Top Fortran Developers for Hire on Freelancer (September 2026), https://www.freelancer.com/hire/fortran
- A FORTRAN program development environment for MS-DOS, https://www.mrt.tas.gov.au/mrtdoc/dominfo/download/UR1993_07/UR1993_07.pdf
- Fortran in Modern Scientific Computing: An Unexpected Comeback, https://medium.com/@stack1/fortran-in-modern-scientific-computing-an-unexpected-comeback-55be2564d22d
- Do Fortran compilers really generate faster code than C compilers?, https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/60372/do-fortran-compilers-really-generate-faster-code-than-c-compilers
- IBM Fortran Compiler /2 - WinWorld, https://winworldpc.com/product/ibm-fortran-compiler/-2
- Is Fortran code still faster than C code? - Reddit, https://www.reddit.com/r/fortran/comments/1cozndo/is_fortran_code_still_faster_than_c_code/
- SIMD City: Auto-Vectorisation - Hacker News, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46336019
- CUDA Pro Tip: Optimize for Pointer Aliasing | NVIDIA Technical Blog, https://developer.nvidia.com/blog/cuda-pro-tip-optimize-pointer-aliasing/
- Running Fortran on DOSBOX - VOGONS, https://www.vogons.org/viewtopic.php?t=45466
- 800 All Malware Reverse Engineer Salary Jobs & Work - Indeed, https://www.indeed.com/q-all-malware-reverse-engineer-salary-jobs.html
- MS-FORTRAN : r/vintagecomputing - Reddit, https://www.reddit.com/r/vintagecomputing/comments/12r1kws/msfortran/
Inline numbers in other segments (e.g.
...conventions2.) refer to this list.
Review findings for this part
Section titled “Review findings for this part”Pass 1 found nothing in this part. This does not mean that the part is correct. Nobody challenged it yet.
Review worksheet
Section titled “Review worksheet”1. Goal of this part
Section titled “1. Goal of this part”What does this part try to show, or help the reader decide?
2. Key claims to test
Section titled “2. Key claims to test”| # | Claim | Evidence given (citation / data) | Verifiable? |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
3. Adversarial review
Section titled “3. Adversarial review”- Strongest counter-argument:
- Unsupported, overstated, or outdated claims:
- Source quality (primary vs. blog/forum/marketing):
- Omissions / what a skeptic would ask:
- Internal consistency with other segments:
4. Evaluation
Section titled “4. Evaluation”- Does the segment achieve its goal? (Yes / Partly / No)
- Confidence: (High / Medium / Low)
- Required fixes: